Tuesday 17 May 2016



sudden enlightenment is visionary

5 comments:

  1. Could you further clarify on what you mean by solipsism? Do you mean metaphysical, epistemological, or methodological solipsism? I have a hard time accepting metaphysical solipsism, but you claim its possible because of parallel realities?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. a good quote off the web

      " in respect of metaphysical solipsism, everything is part of the constituents of mind (the synchronic entirety of the constituents of conscious experience), even the idea that "this" mind may not be all there is.

      That leaves open the logically possible scenarios that "this" mind is "all there is", and that "this" mind isn't "all there is".

      How can this be judged given only the constituents of "this" mind?

      http://forums.philosophyforums.com/threads/a-refutation-of-solipsism-67257-5.html

      Delete
    2. yeah, it goes nowhere because it goes somewhere !

      Delete
  2. I agree with you on how communal objectivity is wrong though.

    ReplyDelete