this blog is the continuation of a genuine mystical tradition, unless you get in daily contemplative time and abstain to a significant degree from "entertainment" then you are just wasting your time and mine !
interestingly heidegger would have to be the ultimate unsuccessful philosopher, that of one with a very strong body of work and insight but his reputation forever tainted by his card carrying party member nazism and anti-semitism !
good post thanx ! : o )
i'm with you on cats, i thinks sepehr is projecting, my experience with the feral family here is that basically they are a rampant breeding agenda, you can't see that in a domestic feline situation being neutered and single !
cats are interesting because of the way they mode between feral and domestic, people only see the domestic but feral is more what they are !
when a feral mother litter reaches a certain age she will test my response to her kittens by placing her most disposable kitten somewhere i can see or locate it . .
sorta fascinating the the dynamics really . .
in the wild they breed rapidly, but they also have a high death rate, very much the darwinian creature !
I agree with you on how household cats mode between being feral and domestic, but human beings are more like wolves. I find most cats do fine in solitude -- they don't become lonely like humans. They also still maintain a spontaneity and creativity. In Charles Bukowski's poems on cats, he claims he had learned a lot from them.
Hey, an3drew, I've been thinking a lot lately, and I don't understand how you consider Edward Snowden a traitor when you're solipsistic and there is no communal objectivism. What is betrayal when one is just solipsistic?
It's just a genuine curiosity... I have been thinking a lot over this. Genuinely confused, considering you've proposed all attempts at betterment are insufficient.
"the solipsism of zen implies a limited concern for the welfare of others and total scepticism as regarding any “ betterment ” of the universe . ."
What is one betraying if there is no communal objectivity and, instead, there's just solipsism?
well its the most pragmatic perspective on him, like julian assange/bradley manning they have really caused huge diplomatic and intelligence operational damage purely against the western alliance and in favour of russia and china which makes them hangable traitors !
that is the social stability of the societies we are in have been damaged by it !
of course the iraq war which was really a creation of george bush and karl rove was way more damaging and there's no way either of those two will ever face the death penalty !
assange and snowden are oppositional defiant, semantic pragmatic disordered and on autistic spectrum which is yet another perspective !
you just get shifting perspectives, i just happen to mention one !
i don't particularly believe or validate one over another except in context !
and i don't completely deny the validity of communal objectivism . .
solipsism may be truer but it also doesn't survive very well, so you end up juggling the balls of solipsism, communal objectivism and subjectivism . . .
i'm always sceptical of what i write and think, its just one opinion on its way to another opinion . .
since my views are in a continual process of modification, i am naturally sceptical, that scepticisms inheres in the view and its mutability itself !
if you have a fixed viewpoint that is not open to the process of modification so to speak, that's not zen and is stuck !
for instance my view that i am the seventh patriarch i often throw up as being wrong or delusive, yet through the process of being open to modification it has always come back as correct which actually has surprised me, that is it is correct regardless of my own misgivings about it !
sepehr, i think you are engaged in constructing a semantically coherent meta, some rigid about, but you know like jason pursuing his line of questioning, its not some "meta" about, but the actual questioning and follow on
that's zen or true inquiry, the metas that arise are mutable and move with the inquiry, there's no point of rest, no proxy, just movement . .
what does it matter if i put a space between my ending punctuation ? i used to write in all lowercase, i used to write in all caps lock, what does it matter ? are you turning on your guru already ? is that your fourth cycle of a religion in one year ?
you can fuck off and leave me alone, but you won't because you like being a piece of shit
zakaj, didn't i tell you gabriel pradiipaka wasn't enlightened when you first started on that binge ?
you're not giving me credit for knowing what i am on about, jason does and doesn't re-invent the wheel but moves forward on what he finds useful to himself !
you are disputing me all the time, well that's not the basis for this forum !
i can tell you, you are putting your energy in the wrong place, be smart and pick up more what i say !
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deleteinterestingly heidegger would have to be the ultimate unsuccessful philosopher, that of one with a very strong body of work and insight but his reputation forever tainted by his card carrying party member nazism and anti-semitism !
Deletegood post thanx ! : o )
i'm with you on cats, i thinks sepehr is projecting, my experience with the feral family here is that basically they are a rampant breeding agenda, you can't see that in a domestic feline situation being neutered and single !
Charles Bukowski would agree with me on cats. He wrote a lot of poetry on his cats. I linked one.
Delete
Deletecats are interesting because of the way they mode between feral and domestic, people only see the domestic but feral is more what they are !
when a feral mother litter reaches a certain age she will test my response to her kittens by placing her most disposable kitten somewhere i can see or locate it . .
sorta fascinating the the dynamics really . .
in the wild they breed rapidly, but they also have a high death rate, very much the darwinian creature !
I agree with you on how household cats mode between being feral and domestic, but human beings are more like wolves. I find most cats do fine in solitude -- they don't become lonely like humans. They also still maintain a spontaneity and creativity. In Charles Bukowski's poems on cats, he claims he had learned a lot from them.
DeleteAlso, yeah, cats are hard-asses.
What do you think of this song and video?
Deletehttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TU1oxw5TEg
not really "there" cliched, behind the times in terms of music technology, i presume drug brain damaged . .
Deletethere's just so much mediocre shit in this world and apparently thats all that pays !
the more mediocre they are the more aggressively they defend their viewpoint or way of doing things
as charles bukowski notes in his poems !
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteHey, an3drew, I've been thinking a lot lately, and I don't understand how you consider Edward Snowden a traitor when you're solipsistic and there is no communal objectivism. What is betrayal when one is just solipsistic?
ReplyDeleteIt's just a genuine curiosity... I have been thinking a lot over this. Genuinely confused, considering you've proposed all attempts at betterment are insufficient.
"the solipsism of zen implies a limited concern for the welfare of others and total scepticism as regarding any “ betterment ” of the universe . ."
What is one betraying if there is no communal objectivity and, instead, there's just solipsism?
well its the most pragmatic perspective on him, like julian assange/bradley manning they have really caused huge diplomatic and intelligence operational damage purely against the western alliance and in favour of russia and china which makes them hangable traitors !
Deletethat is the social stability of the societies we are in have been damaged by it !
of course the iraq war which was really a creation of george bush and karl rove was way more damaging and there's no way either of those two will ever face the death penalty !
assange and snowden are oppositional defiant, semantic pragmatic disordered and on autistic spectrum which is yet another perspective !
you just get shifting perspectives, i just happen to mention one !
i don't particularly believe or validate one over another except in context !
and i don't completely deny the validity of communal objectivism . .
solipsism may be truer but it also doesn't survive very well, so you end up juggling the balls of solipsism, communal objectivism and subjectivism . . .
i'm always sceptical of what i write and think, its just one opinion on its way to another opinion . .
since my views are in a continual process of modification, i am naturally sceptical, that scepticisms inheres in the view and its mutability itself !
if you have a fixed viewpoint that is not open to the process of modification so to speak, that's not zen and is stuck !
for instance my view that i am the seventh patriarch i often throw up as being wrong or delusive, yet through the process of being open to modification it has always come back as correct which actually has surprised me, that is it is correct regardless of my own misgivings about it !
sepehr, i think you are engaged in constructing a semantically coherent meta, some rigid about, but you know like jason pursuing his line of questioning, its not some "meta" about, but the actual questioning and follow on
that's zen or true inquiry, the metas that arise are mutable and move with the inquiry, there's no point of rest, no proxy, just movement . .
i will be watching out for pectin, but the yogurt is only whole pasteurized milk and live active cultures !
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deleteits not the end of the sentence you wish to exclaim but the whole sentence or paragraph, same with question marks, so a space conveys this better !
Deletelots of people object, don't know why, merely because its not what they are used to i suppose, this self-appointed intelligent species !
This comment has been removed by the author.
Delete" being inspired by a person is one thing, but even copying the way they write exclamation marks ?
Deletesounds like an extreme case of Freudian transference. the "guru-effect" in full power here, whether you care to admit it or not !"
sounds like you are pissing your time away as usual zakaj !
life's short why buy fights ?
read the terms of reference, don't waste my time with your silliness, reddit zen is always open to you . .
what i was holding myself back from saying
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deletezakaj, why is your goal to ruin this space ?
Deletewhat does it matter if i put a space between my ending punctuation ? i used to write in all lowercase, i used to write in all caps lock, what does it matter ? are you turning on your guru already ? is that your fourth cycle of a religion in one year ?
you can fuck off and leave me alone, but you won't because you like being a piece of shit
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deletezakaj, didn't i tell you gabriel pradiipaka wasn't enlightened when you first started on that binge ?
ReplyDeleteyou're not giving me credit for knowing what i am on about, jason does and doesn't re-invent the wheel but moves forward on what he finds useful to himself !
you are disputing me all the time, well that's not the basis for this forum !
i can tell you, you are putting your energy in the wrong place, be smart and pick up more what i say !
be dumb and fight a losing battle for ever !
This comment has been removed by the author.
Deletezakaj, the problem is i don't have the time to correct your bullshit, what i say you just ignore . .
Deletecongratulations on being the first person banned here, any future posts by you will be removed !
lol
" whatever has a bitter taste is bound to be good medicine "
don't let us know how it goes ! :o)
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Deletezakaj, you have chosen the way of specious verbalization, the real way is contemplative solitude . .
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
Delete