this blog is the continuation of a genuine mystical tradition, unless you get in daily contemplative time and abstain to a significant degree from "entertainment" then you are just wasting your time and mine !
Could you further clarify on what you mean by solipsism? Do you mean metaphysical, epistemological, or methodological solipsism? I have a hard time accepting metaphysical solipsism, but you claim its possible because of parallel realities?
" in respect of metaphysical solipsism, everything is part of the constituents of mind (the synchronic entirety of the constituents of conscious experience), even the idea that "this" mind may not be all there is.
That leaves open the logically possible scenarios that "this" mind is "all there is", and that "this" mind isn't "all there is".
How can this be judged given only the constituents of "this" mind?
Could you further clarify on what you mean by solipsism? Do you mean metaphysical, epistemological, or methodological solipsism? I have a hard time accepting metaphysical solipsism, but you claim its possible because of parallel realities?
ReplyDeletea good quote off the web
Delete" in respect of metaphysical solipsism, everything is part of the constituents of mind (the synchronic entirety of the constituents of conscious experience), even the idea that "this" mind may not be all there is.
That leaves open the logically possible scenarios that "this" mind is "all there is", and that "this" mind isn't "all there is".
How can this be judged given only the constituents of "this" mind?
http://forums.philosophyforums.com/threads/a-refutation-of-solipsism-67257-5.html
What a koan...
Deleteyeah, it goes nowhere because it goes somewhere !
DeleteI agree with you on how communal objectivity is wrong though.
ReplyDelete